Can the Inhibitory Quotient (IQ) be Useful in Clinical Pratice?

Can the Inhibitory Quotient (IQ) be Useful in Clinical Pratice?

Anne-Mieke Vandamme

NULL

*Correspondence: Anne-Mieke Vandamme, Email not available

Abstract

Two recent reports support the predictive value ofthe inhibitory quotient (IQ) for virologic response toantiretroviral therapy (Casado et al. AIDS 2003;17:262-4; Shulman et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2002;46:3907-16). IQ is a measure that integratesboth resistance and drug levels. It is usually expressedas the ratio of Ctrough/IC50, where IC50can be derived from real phenotype or a phenotypicinterpretation of the genotype (when a virtual phenotypeis used, then often is referred as virtual or vIQ).Casado et al., reported results using dual PI combinations(with NRTI) in heavily pretreated patients.The virologic response at 3 months was significantlybetter among patients with an IQ greater than 1 fornelfinavir and saquinavir (27 patients on dual nelfinavir/saquinavir therapy). The results were similar forindinavir and ritonavir (25 patients on this dual PItherapy, pooling 400/400 mg dosing and 800/100 mgdosing), but those results were only borderline significant.In some way it is surprising that such a low IQ(PI trough concentrations were higher than thoseneeded to inhibit only 50% of the virus replication)were still sufficient to provide a significant viral loaddrop. In many cases, achievement of higher IQvalues may be unrealistic in such a population withpre-existing resistance to PIs.

Contents

DOI not available
    DOI not available